+ Generally finfluencers produce content on a wide range of financial topics, which they often make available for free. This content can include blog posts, social media posts, podcasts, guides and books.
+ On the ground, we hear from the public that most finfluencers in Singapore have created accessible resources that help people improve their financial literacy and make better informed financial decisions.
On the other hand, being engaged closely with many retail investors over the years, some have also shared their candid, heartfelt thoughts with us about certain aspects of finfluencers that may not sit well with them personally:
– Pushing Too Many Paid Promotions
While personal finance influencers may derive income through affiliate marketing/ sponsored posts, problems arise when their content becomes overly promotional. Some influencers may also promote products they haven’t personally used and their main focus becomes making money rather than providing genuine recommendations.
Inevitably, these finfluencers may turn into “product peddlers,” serving as spokespeople for any brand willing to pay. In some cases, finfluencers may even own separate marketing companies, using financial topics as a front to drive product sales and guest speaker engagements.
– Preying on Financial Anxiety
Another troubling trend among certain finfluencers is their tendency to prey on financial anxieties. By leveraging followers’ greed, they promote their own strategies as the only way to achieve financial success. Often, they market “guaranteed” results, pushing high-risk tactics or shill certain securities. Red flags may include creators who promote rapid wealth-building methods without considering alternatives, or insist that their approach is the only viable investment strategy.
Such finfluencers can be harmful, as their advice may lead vulnerable followers to make hasty financial decisions driven by greed or a fear of missing out (FOMO). Such one-sided perspective can mislead followers, especially those new to investing, leading to poorly informed financial choices.
– Credentials Are Good, But May Not Always Help
A common misconception is that credentials automatically make a financial influencer more trustworthy. While a license or educational background in finance can be helpful, it doesn’t necessarily mean the person’s advice is infallible. Credentials can indicate a certain level of foundational knowledge, but even licensed professionals can sometimes (often) provide advice that doesn’t age well in social media.
For instance, we heard from many retail investors shared that some of them also tend to promote certain securities during market highs and become overly pessimistic during market lows, potentially encouraging followers to buy high or sell low based on herd mentality on most occasions. In truth, some financial advisors are indeed more successful in selling advice than in generating wealth from the markets themselves.
Conversely, some finfluencers without formal qualifications can provide valuable insights drawn from personal experience and a deep understanding of financial topics. These finfluencers can simplify complex financial terms into understandable, actionable advice, often resonating with a broad audience, as seen on platforms like InvestingNote.
While credentials can add a layer of assurance, they are not the sole indicator of good financial guidance. Wisdom and sound advice can come from both credentialed professionals and those with practical knowledge of personal finance.